Bloomberg Businessweek Racist Cover Sparks Outrage

The latest edition of Bloomberg Businessweek is getting a lot of press…for the wrong reasons. The newest cover of the magazine features what many are calling racist African American caricatures, grabbing for money as the headline reads, “The Great American Housing Rebound: Flips. No-look bids. 300-percent returns. What could possibly go wrong?” Apparently those at Bloomberg Businessweek think the housing boom and subsequent bust of a few years back was the result of minorities making unwise decisions to buy homes they couldn’t afford.

Because the banks never knowingly gave money to financially unstable families.

Black people of all hues swimming in cash like Scrooge McDuck, drawn with over-sized lips, sitting around the house, and looking like they’re taking advantage of the upcoming projected housing boom. This is the message that Bloomberg Businessweek approved when they ran that cover. It’s hard to believe that this is a real cover. However, racists drawings are nothing new for some well-established magazines. In 2008, the New Yorker ran a cover showcasing the Obama family as Muslim terrorists during his initial presidential run.

Slate.com describes Bloomberg Businessweek as “…a genuinely great magazine that does an amazing job of making business and economics news accessible and interesting.” Many people feel that is true. Bloomberg is like the “Business for dummies” monthly publications that educates averages joes about everything from the real estate market to the stock market. Perhaps because of how great the magazine is with putting difficult financial matters into lay-mens terms is why this cover is so offensive. As the Slate article states, the cover is “warning that minorities may be buying houses again,” as if responsible homeownership is a problem. The Slate writer continued, “The idea is that we can know things are really getting out of hand since even non-white people can get loans these days! They ought to be ashamed.”

Indeed.

The Bloomberg family, (think Mayor of New York) founded and continues to produce the magazine. Whether any member of the family signed off on this cover is unknown, but one thing is for certain; the message it conveys is at the very least offensive and at the very most outright racist.

 

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top