Rep. Keith Ellison Attacks Hannity And Fox News For Bias

A Tuesday night interview on Fox News quickly turned into a faceoff between host Sean Hannity and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) when Ellison berated Hannity for the network’s attacks on President Barack Obama. Before Ellison joined the program, Hannity blamed the president for the “sequester” budget cuts, airing a pair of clips of Obama asking Congress to halt the mandatory cuts. Ellison, apparently upset by Fox’s coverage of the economic issue, launched into a tirade, accusing Hannity of practicing “yellow journalism,” and saying that the host was “the worst excuse for a journalist I’ve ever seen.”

“The people watching the show should ignore all of the commentary that you put in and all of this heightened music that you put on and should pay attention to what the president actually said,” Ellison continued, egged on by Hannity. “Because what the president said was true. You, by the way, are inaccurate when you say that the president is to blame here, he’s not.”

Ellison went on to pin the blame on Republicans for the sequester, while Hannity accused the congressman of ranting, eventually ending the interview. The heated exchange was not uncharacteristic of the program or Fox News. It is usually Hannity and Fox hosts like Bill O’Reilly doing the ranting. Though Ellison effectively turned the tables on Hannity, his point was hardly communicated through his direct attacks.

Instead, the argument was more characteristic of the conflicts currently keeping Washington’s lawmakers divided. In identifying Hannity as “a shill for the Republican Party,” Ellison continued to divide the discussion along party lines.

Tuesday’s appearance was not Ellison’s first on the network. He also appeared in 2007 to discuss the Bush administration’s handling of the 9/11 terror attacks, and again in 2011 to talk about the network’s discrimination against the Muslim community.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top