John Williams wants to Score the New 'Star Wars' Films

There’s a lot of talk swirling about who from the original Star Wars trilogy will or won’t be returning for 2015’s Episode VII. Now, a new name has been officially tossed into the ring, although a lot of people have been expecting if not hoping for it already. John Williams is the only movie composer whom most people can name, thanks to his providing the musical scores for all of the Star Wars films, in addition to half of Steven Spielberg’s ouvre, among other famous compositions.

Last week, while conducting a concert of the Young Musician’s Foundation Debut Orchestra, Williams said this to the audience:

“We’re about to play Star Wars [audience interrupts with cheers] and each time we play it, I’m reminded of the first time we played it decades ago. Neither I, nor George, nor anyone else involved thought this would go far or in a few years there would be a sequel and I’d have to revisit the themes…and years later another trilogy. Now we’re hearing of a new set of movies coming in 2015, 2016…so I need to make sure I’m still ready to go in a few years for what I hope would be continued work with George… [more cheers].”

Really, if it weren’t for the fact that Michael Giacchino has scored all of Episode VII director J.J. Abram’s previous films, Williams would be an unquestionable shoo-in for the job. Giacchino is the hot new thing on the film score scene, and hes most likely itching to wave his conductor baton at the wars among the stars. Who will Abrams pick? More importantly, who is more likely to do a better job? Sound off in the comments, if you wish.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top