Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Local
LocalPolitics

Proposed Atlanta Ordinance Would Banish Prostitutes

Posted byBy ABS Contributor | Published on: CommentsComments (1)

The city of Atlanta is close to approving an ordinance that would impose harsher sentences for those convicted of prostitution… that includes solicitors and panderers.

Repeat offenders could be banished from city limits.

Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed says he has an obligation to protect residents and business owners who live and work unfortunately in areas also known for prostitution.

 

So, here’s the scope of the ordinance:

After the first conviction, the sentencing court could banish someone from those places designated as “areas of prostitution.”

A second conviction while on probation could result in longer jail sentences and higher fines.

But it also could result in being banished from the city.

WABE legal analyst Page Pate says this does not violate anyone’s constitutional rights, and in fact it’s not unusual.

“The Georgia constitution does contain a provision that prohibits a court from banishing someone from the entire state. But as long as the legislation and in this case an ordinance gives the person an opportunity to still live within the state and in this case live within the city, it’ll probably pass any constitutional challenge.”

But Pate says what could be a problem for the city is actually enforcing the law.

“How are you possibly going to monitor someone to that extent to know whether they ever enter into a zone? How are you going to mark the zones? I think practically it’ll be very difficult to implement this ordinance”…

Read more: WABE

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top