NRA President Promises to Oppose Assault Weapon Ban

National Rifle Association President David Keene says that a proposed assault weapon ban will not have the strength to pass in Congress, and maintained that the organization would oppose any such restrictions.Vice President Joe Biden is set to announce a series of proposals to curb gun violence, prompted by the tragic shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., last month. The NRA has rejected the preliminary outline of Biden’s proposals, according to Keene, who appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday.

“We’re not going to compromise on people’s rights when there is no evidence that doing so is going to serve a purpose,”Keene said during the program.

“We don’t think any of those things work,” he continued. “You should absolutely be able to compromise on things that accomplish the purpose. Our objection to those things is that they interfere with people’s rights, without doing anything to solve the problem.”

Several congressmen have already expressed their desire to impose stricter regulations on assault weapons. Gun control advocates maintain that automatic weapons have no practical use, but the NRA refuses to support any legislation that would lead to restricting the weapons, basing their stance on the Second Amendment.

“They are not going to be able to get an assault weapons ban through Congress,” Keene said. “The fact is that we live in a society where first of all, we have constitutional rights, and secondly, there are millions upon millions of Americans who value the rights that they have under the Second Amendment and who are involved in the shooting sports or use firearms for self-defense, and we think that they will be heard.”

President Barack Obama identified gun violence as one of the major issues he plans to address during his second term in office. He will no doubt focus on some of Biden’s proposals during his State of the Union address on Feb. 12.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top