Occupy Atlanta Says City Suppressed Evidence in Woodruff Park Trespass Case

With the holidays, Woodruff park is all dressed up and ready for Christmas. It is a far cry from the scene there just over a year ago.

That’s when scores of Atlanta police officers moved in to evict Occupy Atlanta from the park, after mayor Kasim Reed issued an executive order citing safety concerns.

“We’re asking Mayor Reed: ‘What do you have to hide?'” shouted Atlanta state senator Vincent Fort, who was among a crowd of Occupy supporters, protesters and attorneys gathered outside City Hall.

On Friday, lawyers for the Occupy movement accused the city of suppressing evidence that could have been used to exonerate them of the charges they face for taking over the park.

“These documents are evidence that what was said initially, that Occupy was a safety hazard, was in fact untrue,” said Occupy defense attorney Mawuli Mel Davis.

The protesters have been vocal all week as their cases have finally gone to city court. Their lawyers say the documents they’ve just now received are critical to their defense.

Read more:  11Alive News

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top