Protecting Kids Online, There’s No App for That

Nighty Night! App

The FTC reminded us Monday what many a parent knows all too well: Not all kids’ apps are safe, especially where privacy is concerned. So, as a parent of two small children in a house full of tablets, what do I do to keep them safe? Here are my guidelines:

Read the reviews: Parents may be the most vocal group when it comes to app reviews, and the commentary under kids’ apps will tell you almost immediately if there’s a concern. If you notice a bunch of five-stars and just one or two one-star reviews, you’re probably safe, but if you see an issue mentioned several times, and it strikes you as a problem, walk away. There are too many kids’ apps out there for any one to make or break your kid’s day.

No ad-supported apps: “Free,” ad-supported apps are called out by the FTC because so much information is shared with the advertiser or a third-party tracker. Paying for apps usually means you’re buying insurance against some of this funny business — not just against ads, but also in-app money-making schemes. (More on that next.) Higher-quality kids’ apps range from $1.99 to $6.99. That may seem “steep” in the app galaxy, but that pricing is cheaper than most children’s books, and app updates usually cost nothing.

No in-app purchases: I am very much opposed to any kids’ app that is offered for free, only to tease a bunch of in-app purchases, like a “free” virtual fish tank that comes with just two fish — but you can buy more for $1.99 a piece! That is a technique that is used to win over the kid first, so that a reluctant parent is guilt-tripped into spending money. Better for parent to choose to spend a fixed amount up front.

No social log-ins or sharing: My kids are way too young to “share” their drawings and other creations with the world, or care what total stranger kids out there are up to. That will change as they age, but I will always be aware of what apps make social sharing a key focus, and I’ll evaluate the risks on a per-app basis.

Read more: Wilson Rothman, NBC News

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top