Word Of Possible Jesse Jackson, Jr. Plea Deal Angers Supporters

A supporter of troubled Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. says she feels betrayed by his reported decision to negotiate a possible plea deal with federal authorities while running for re-election.

“To slap us in the face now, you just lied to us,” Ald. Carrie Austin (34th) told NBC Chicago. “You just lied to us. I feel so betrayed.”

Her comments come on the heels of a report by the Chicago Sun-Times, which cited an unnamed source in publishing word late Wednesday night of the ongoing plea deal negotiations. According to the report, Jackson, 47, may have also used campaign funds to buy a $40,000 Rolex watch for a female friend.

Austin said the voters who overwhelmingly re-elected Jackson with 64 percent of the vote to represent Illinois’ 2nd Congressional District on Tuesday night deserved to know the truth.

Federal prosecutors in October launched a criminal investigation of Jackson, Jr. involving financial improprieties, including possible misuse of funds monitored by Congress to decorate his home in Washington, D.C.

Jackson’s attorneys have met with federal investigators, but a criminal defense attorney unrelated to the case said he doesn’t think prosecutors cared about Tuesday’s election.

“I don’t know if they gave him a pass until after the election but then they’re not going to rush because there is an election to charge somebody either,” attorney Steven Greenberg told the TV station. “They charge you when they’re good and ready to charge you.”

Greenberg said that if Jackson is working on a plea deal, he likely would be unable to avoid prison time.

Jackson recently returned to the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota for treatment of bipolar disorder.

If Jackson were to resign from Congress, a special election would be held to replace him.

“He was an up-and-coming star,” said University of Illinois Chicago political science professor Dick Simpson. “He had accomplished good things for his district. He was seen by everybody as someone who was going to move onto higher office.”

The congressman’s legal problems also seem to be taking a toll on his wife, Ald. Sandi Jackson (7th). She was a no-show at Thursday’s hearing on Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s proposed city budget.

The heir apparent to the Jackson dynasty, Jackson has been shrouded in a cloud of federal scrutiny for the past three years.

In late 2008, Jackson sought the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama when he became president, but was also mentioned in connection with the “pay to play” sale of that Senate slot that led to the conviction of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Jackson has always denied involvement and was never charged.

“This has been an ongoing nightmare for the Jackson family, particularly his wife, Ald. Sandi Jackson, and the Reverend [his father, Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.],” added the source, who is familiar with the campaign funds probe.

The latest FBI inquiry into Jackson’s possible misuse of campaign funds began before Jackson went on medical leave in June.

Disclosure of the new federal probe, conducted by the FBI’s Washington field office, was first reported by Sun-Times reporter Natasha Korecki last month.

In 2008, after Blagojevich was arrested, millionaire businessman Raghuveer Nayak, a Dem political fundraiser, talked to the feds. Nayak told them he, at Jackson’s request, paid for two airline trips for the congressman’s “social acquaintance” – a woman named Giovana Huidobro, a Washington restaurant hostess.

In an exclusive interview in September 2010, Sandi Jackson told Sneed about her private anguish due to the “extramarital relationship” with the blonde nightclub hostess conducted by her husband, but added that they had decided to remain together and undergo marital counseling.

Frank Watkins, a spokesman in Jackson’s congressional office, refused to comment on the potential plea deal.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top