New Study: High-School Popularity Good Indicator of Future Success

It turns out life may be a popularity contest, after all. Studies show that looks, and now high school popularity, may be reliable indicators for employees’ success at work.

According to a study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research, people who were viewed by their classmates as popular in high school earn 2% higher wages than their peers 35 years later. The study also found a 10% wage gap 40 years later between people ranked in the 20th percentile of popularity versus those ranked in the 80th percentile.

The study uses the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study of students, which, The Wall Street Journal reports, has been conducted over a span of more than 50 years. Rather than ask students outright if they are popular, the study is based on a friend nomination system from other students. Researchers look at students’ links to one another and their web of interpersonal relationships.

But what does all of this have to do with a person’s success?

By adulthood, the researchers conclude, “an individual needs to have acquired and developed the appropriate social skills: understand the ‘rules of the game’–how to gain acceptance and social support…

Read more: Maeghan Ouimet, Inc.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top