O’Reilly, Conservatives Attack CNN’s Crowley For Debate Actions

Talk show host Bill O’Reilly became the latest conservative voice to attack journalist Candy Crowley for her role as a moderator during Tuesday night’s second presidential debate between incumbent Barack Obama and Republican hopeful Mitt Romney.

O’Reilly accused the veteran CNN anchor for stepping out of the ring of impartiality to defend Obama when the two candidates faced off over the administration’s handling of last month’s attack in Libya.

Crowley corrected Romney following his accusation that Obama had not said it was a terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.

O’Reilly said that by fact-checking Romney in real time, Crowley “helped the president… when she should have stayed neutral.”

O’Reilly argued that the comments Obama made in the Rose Garden the day after the attacks were more generic, and he was not “specifically” calling what happened in Libya a terrorist attack.

O’Reilly became the latest right-leaning critic of Crowley’s actions. Earlier in the day, conservative firebrand Rush Limbaugh accused Crowley of “journalistic terror” for “feeding Obama lines.”

Crowley has defended her actions, saying she was simply trying to move the debate along.

O’Reilly concluded from the debate that the president “helped his cause” considerably following his first debate performance, but that Romney also had considerable success, establishing himself as the president’s “equal” on policy.

O’Reilly thought that Obama “gained the most” from Tuesday night’s debate at Hofstra University, saying that the president’s best moment was at the end when he brought up Romney’s comments about the 47 percent, while Romney’s best moment was when he attacked Obama on not keeping his promises to improve the economy.

But in the moment when Romney confronted Obama over energy policy, O’Reilly thought the exchange “did not [make him] look presidential, he looked like a cable news analyst.” On the other hand, O’Reilly thought that Obama came out looking weak when talking about gas prices and dodging an important question about the amount of security provided to the consulate in Libya.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top