'Taken 2' May Fall Short At The Box Office…

Taken 2 hits 3,661 theaters this weekend, making it the second largest release in history for a live-action in October.

The first Taken became an instant favorite for movie-goers, debuting to a surprising $24 million in 2009. At the end of its run, the film earned an incredible $145 million and despite its simple concept and theme, the film remains largely popular even after three years.

Taken star Liam Neeson used his newly acquired action clout and have starred in a few other action movies such as Clash of the Titans, Wrath of the Titans, Battleship and The Grey. None of which came even close to the money and popularity of the first Taken.

Watch Taken 2 trailer

Take 2 is expected to attract a decent crowd this weekend, despite receiving some crushing reviews from critics. “Lazy and undeserving of Neeson,” Jeremy Kirk of Firstshowing.net, wrote in his piece describing the action scenes in the movie. Although, bad reviews probably wont deter fans from seeing the movie this opening weekend, but if fans feel the same as critics, they may feel cheated, therefore killing the turn out and its chance of matching the first Taken’s numbers.

Source

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top