Atlanta’s Water Rates Spike Higher Than Other Cities Over Last 12 Years

USA Today released a study that examines the residential water rates of 100 municipalities across the country. According to their findings, Atlanta ranked atop those cities, claiming the largest spike in rates over the past 12 years.

While more than a quarter of those municipalities have seen their water bills double since 2001, Atlanta’s rates grew by approximately 233 percent. That echoes what the City of Atlanta’s audit — released earlier this week — stated regarding ratepayer costs, which have increased 81 percent since 2008.

In addition, USA Today also notes that the City of Atlanta’s rates — measured by monthly usage of 1,000 cubic feet of water — can be partially attributed to $1.3 billion spent on improvements to the city’s water supply system in order to remain complaint with federal mandates. This includes, as Thomas Wheatley pointed out, sewer work that is expected to continue through 2027 — thanks to the 13-year extension that the city received.

According the AJC, city officials expect to maintain currents water rates through at least 2016 — preferring to not lower costs with more upgrades and repairs on the horizon…

Read more: Creative Loafing Atlanta

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top