'Lethal Weapon 5' Loses Mel Gibson

A year ago Warner Bros hinted they were interested in making the fifth installment of the Lethal weapon franchise. However, if the studio plans to move forward with making Lethal Weapon 5, they’re gonna need two new lead actors because Mel Gibson is a no go and Danny Glover doesn’t seem like he’s up for another one either.

In an interview with Cominsoon.net, Gibson made it very clear that he will not do another Lethal Weapon.

“No” said Gibson,  “I think the way things are going, they’ll just remake those somehow. Though it’s really tough to replace Danny [Glover]. He was so amazing in those things. It was a good gig for us. They really afforded me the opportunity to slow down and pick things and do things that really interested me.”

Gibson is referring to his Viking “baby,” titled Berserker.  The actor-director went on to explain how his project has  a good chance of going forward due to some big names that want to do it.

“I’ve got a great script,” he continued. “And the idea’s been batting around my head for years. And I couldn’t find a way to make it work, because if you look at what Vikings did, they’re pretty unsympathetic. And there’s no point in doing Viking light. So I had to find a way to find devices and ways to make that work dramatically, intelligently and make it seem realistic.”

Gibson is no stranger to pushing the envelop in his films. One of his most controversial pieces, The Passion Of The Christ offended many as he graphically recreated the killing of Jesus Christ by the Jews.

Sincee Lethal Weapon 5 will not see Mel Gibson return, its pretty safe to assume the same thing applies to Danny Glover because this time he really is too old for this s***!  If the fifth installment will be anything like its predecessors, there is no way the 66 year-old actor can keep up with those crazy stunts.

Source

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top