Serena Williams Planning For 2016 Olympics

Understanding that she is at the height of her game – and believing that there is no foreseeable reason why she cannot stay there – Olympic women’s singles champion Serena Williams already is looking ahead to defending her gold medal in the 2016 Games in Rio de Janeiro.

At 30 now, even if she can avoid major injury, Williams would be quite pass her prime to compete against up-and-coming teenagers tennis fans have yet to even discover.

But Williams insists she will be there, “unless an act of God doesn’t allow me to,” she said.

The 14-time Grand Slam singles champion says she has no plans on slowing down, especially after overcoming health scares that sidelined her for 14 months.

“When I feel I can’t be greatest, I shouldn’t play anymore,” she said. “But I feel I belong. I’m not tired, I’m enjoying myself.”

Williams surely looked like she was having a ball in dismantling Maria Sharapova of Russia to add Olympic gold to her singles titles in all four major tournaments. The so-called “Golden Slam” has been accomplished only by Williams and Steffi Graf.

Williams added to her medal count a day after embarrassing Sharapova. She teamed with sister Venus to win the gold in doubles for the third time in the Olympics.

“In our house,” Venus Williams said, “when there’s a party, whenever we’re at home, times get down, we go down and look at our golds and we’re right back up.”

And with good reason. With her weekend in London, Serena solidified her place as one of the greatest female athletes of all time. No one else in tennis history has won all four major championships, plus an Olympic gold in both singles and doubles.

Adding another medal in four years, at age 34, would put Serena Williams in out-of-this-world category.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top