Obama Campaign Sues Ohio Over Voting Rights

After doing a lot of complaining and speechifying about the voting restrictions Republicans have implemented around the country, the Obama campaign today took the next step in their fight: The campaign filed a lawsuit against the state of Ohio for eliminating early voting in the final three days before the election.

It is the first lawsuit the Obama campaign has filed in favor of voting rights this election.

A quick look at the math reveals why the Obama campaign felt this was an important issue to fight. In the 2008 election, more than 1.7 million people in Ohio voted early—nearly a third of all the ballots cast. Of those 1.7 million, almost 100,000 voted in person in the final three days before the election. It is an option that many people avail themselves of, either to beat the election day rush or perhaps they have to be out of town on election day. Obama won Ohio by slightly more than 200,000 votes—and observers expect it to be even closer this time.

But the Republican-led legislature in Ohio came along and eliminated voting in those three days before the election, prompting the Obama campaign to bring the state to court to restore the voting days.

“This lawsuit seeks to treat all Ohio citizens equally under the law,” Bob Bauer, the attorney for Obama for America, the president’s campaign committee, said during a conference call with reporters. “We want to restore the right of all to vote before Election Day.”

The campaign says changes the Ohio Legislature made created inequality among military and overseas voters, who can cast early ballots through the day before the election, and all other voters, who have until 6 p.m. on the Friday before the election to vote in-person absentee. This, the campaign contends, is a violation of the equal protection provision of the U.S. Constitution.

“Without early voting in these last three days before Election Day, tens of thousands of citizens who would have otherwise exercised their right to vote during this time period, including the plaintiffs’ members and supporters, may not be able to participate in future elections at all,” the campaign’s complaint states.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top