Controversial Georgia Mural Depicting Slavery Goes Back on Display

A controversial mural depicting slavery that until recently greeted visitors to the Georgia Department of Agriculture will be back on display starting in August.

The Georgia Museum of Art, located on the University of Georgia campus, has rescued the painting — part of a series of murals produced by Atlanta-based artist George Beattie in 1956 chronicling the state’s agricultural history — from a state storage facility and will debut the collection Aug. 1.

“As the official state museum of art and as an academic institution, the Georgia Museum of Art believed it was important to preserve this aspect of Georgia’s history,” said Paul Manoguerra, the museum’s chief curator of American art. “The murals present one artist’s attempt to address the complex history of agriculture in our state in 1956.”

The most controversial painting in the series, a seemingly benign portrait of slaves picking cotton while an overseer weighs their bags, formerly graced the wall behind a visitor’s sign-in at the state agriculture building on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive. It seemed to many to be out context, at best, in a government facility and was removed along with the other murals in 2011 by newly elected agriculture commissioner Gary Black, who said at the time, “I think we can depict a better picture of agriculture.”

The museum will feature the murals — which also depict Native Americans, mainly as background characters — along with video narratives by academics examining the “the works’ problematic approach to sensitive issues,” according to a statement.

“I don’t think you learn anything by hiding history,” said Valerie Babb, a professor of English and African-American studies at UGA tapped to provide commentary on the murals. “I think it’s very important to have conversations both about why these panels were painted in the first place and why they were taken down as well as what that reveals about the way we as a culture and a society have changed.”

Source: AJC

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top