Hugo Chavez Defends Obama Against Romney Attack

As Republican challenger Mitt Romney pounced on President Obama for saying that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez did not pose a threat to U.S. national security, Chavez himself came to Obama’s defense and ridiculed the “far right.”

Romney, clearly playing to his conservative base, said Obama’s comments were “stunning and shocking” and demonstrated weakness in the president’s foreign policy. Of course this has been a game Republicans have played for years, invoking the word “weak” every time a Democrat appears to be in any way conciliatory toward other world leaders—particularly leaders who happen to be from black or brown countries.

But Chavez, who announced that he was miraculously free of cancer and ready to run for re-election in Venezuela, was dismissive of Romney and his comments.

“The Venezuela of today is no threat to anyone,” he said in an interview with a local Venezuelan television station. “It has all been a hoax by the imperialists and global far right: that uranium is being enriched in Venezuela, that we’re setting up missiles here, that we’re supporting terrorism.”

Whenever there were efforts to improve relations between Washington and Caracas, Chavez said, they were criticized by powerful “snipers” who issued threats in the U.S. media.

Obama and Chavez have had a complicated relationship over the last few years, made even more complicated by the idiosyncrasies of the Venezuelan leader. Chavez is chummy with Iran and Cuba and their leaders, which is not going to endear him to anyone in Washington, including President Obama. But Obama and Chavez actually shook hands at a summit early in Obama’s administration and Chavez behaved as if he wanted to smooth his relations with an Obama-led U.S. But the harmony didn’t last long.

Within months, Chavez said Obama was disillusioning the world by following George W. Bush’s foreign policies, and he began throwing rhetorical missiles at the U.S. once again.

On Friday, Chavez said Obama’s troubles began with that handshake. “They fell on him: saying he’s a socialist, a communist. … The personal war against Obama started, including looking for a way to get him out of office by any means.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top