Rihanna Sues Accountant For Millions Lost; Nicki Minaj Is Hip Hop

Rihanna claims she lost tens of millions of dollars through her accountant between 2005 and 2010 while Nicki Minaj is defended by Black Eyed Peas front man Will.i.am as hip hop.

Rihanna filed a lawsuit against her accountants in Manhattan federal court for stealing millions of dollars from her since 2005, mishandling her finances and taxes—resulting in her being audited— and failing to pursue considerable amounts that she was owed for royalties.

Rihanna, 24, and her tour company, Tourihanna, is seeking unspecified compensatory damages and loss of earnings from the accountancy firm Berdon LLP and two former employees, Michael Mitnick and Peter Gounis.

In the suit, Rihanna, whose name is Robyn Fenty, is portrayed in the suit as a financial novice who became famous as a teen and relied heavily on her accountants. She began working with Berdon in 2005, when she was just 16, and “a minor with a booming music career and no knowledge or understanding of financial matters whatsoever.”

According to the lawsuit, the accountants concealed facts regarding her finances, and in a deal Rihanna’s lawyers called unusual, earned commissions based on a percentage of Rihanna’s gross receipts which were “exorbitant and expensive.”

One of the most eye-opening facts in the lawsuit was the estimation that between 2007 and 2010, the accountants earned 23 percent of gross tour receipts while Rihanna got 6 percent. The accountants said Rihanna lost millions during her “The Last Girl On Earth” tour, but still paid itself millions in fees.

After she walked away from Berdon, her “Loud” tour earned big money, alerting Rihanna and her team that Berdon had taken millions out of her pocket.

Nicki Minaj Gets defended by Will.i.am

Nicki Minaj’s still young music career has been plagued with criticism over her authenticity to hip hop. One artist who’s scribbled far outside the lines of hip hop is coming to Nicki’s defense. Will.i.Am tells Vibe,

“I’m proud of Nicki. You can’t listen to this stuff about not being real hip-hop. You gotta go and get it. Whatever the music is called that’s what it’s called whether it’s hip-hop, pop, rock, gospel or a freaking musical, who cares? Nicki is an artist and she is expressing herself. Why limit yourself?”

“Hip-Hop was broadening itself in the ‘90s,” he says. “You had A Tribe Called Quest and Death Row…you had Lauryn Hill singing and rapping. You had Too Short, Outkast, Nas and the Roots. Hip-Hop was broadening itself. Now hip-hop is limiting itself. If hip-hop is going to continue to limit people I say ‘F-ck hip-hop.’ It’s like the most unhealthiest community.”

“People should really be tripping off the fact that all of our hip-hop heroes are dying. Heavy D is dead and Erick Sermon recently had a heart attack. And we still talking about Nicki Minaj doing dance music? Get the f-ck out of here. I want Nicki to continue to show the world what hip-hop can be. It doesn’t have to always be about f-cking this stripper girl or getting money. I would rather be interested to hear what Chuck D thinks than some blogger or radio host.”

Source 1, Source 2,

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top