Mitt Romney Accuses President Obama of Not Playing Fair on Immigration

After President Obama captured the public imagination with his executive order allowing hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants to stay in this country, challenger Mitt Romney had a choice: He could either oppose Obama’s initiative and risk alienating millions of Hispanic voters, or he could say Obama wasn’t playing fair by circumventing Congress. Romney chose the latter.

In an appearance on “Face the Nation” yesterday, Romney attacked the president for announcing the order without the approval of Congress.

“This is something Congress has been working on, and I thought we were about to see some proposals brought forward by Sen. Marco Rubio and by Democrat senators, but the president jumped in and said, ’I’m going to take this action’ — he called it a stopgap measure,” Romney said.

In the face of repeated questioning, however, Romney refused to say whether he would reverse the president’s actions if he were elected.

Though the president has a lead among Hispanics that is nearly 40 percent, according to some polls, Romney has made moves to try to bite off a chunk of that support—he recently hired an Hispanic advisor and there is increased talk that he is considering Florida Senator Rubio as his vice presidential pick.

Obama’s executive order grants a temporary, two-year reprieve for young immigrants who came to this country before age 16, who have lived here at least five years and who have clean records.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top