President Obama Wins Poll on Republican Latino Site

Mitt Romney’s Latino outreach got some unhappy news from the RNC’s Latino page through a Spanish-language poll clearly designed to get the opposite response it received. A poll asking in Spanish “Has President Obama disillusioned you?”, as of post publishing time, has 57% of responses answering that no, President Obama has not disillusioned them– a sign that even those willing to venture to the Republican Latin American website aren’t there because they support Romney.

The website,  RNCLatinos.com, has a poll somewhere down the simple interface asking the simple question. President Obama is winning the poll.

The worst thing for Romney about this poll is not the unfortunate optics, or the fact that the difference in enthusiasm and support levels between the two candidates are so stark that they are manifest on RNC websites. The problem is that the fact that Latin Americans aren’t, at least according to both this poll and many scientific ones, disillusioned with the President is a sign that Romney is marketing himself wrong, and not taking on the right line of attack– and that he didn’t wait long enough for effective attacks against the President to set in before putting up the poll.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top