Is New Obama Radio Commercial Offensive?

Even for a candidate like Barack Obama with an approval rating among African Americans approaching 90 percent, it’s still a somewhat dicey proposition to create special commercials tailored to the black community.

Listening to the ad that the Obama campaign released yesterday for black radio, some listeners might feel like Obama crossed the line into patronizing and offensive. With a chintzy R&B track playing in the background, the ad features a group of singers crooning the line “Mr. President, we’ve got your back,” on top of a series of clips from Obama speeches intended to show African Americans the tough stance he’s taken on issues the black community cares about, such as education and healthcare.

Some listeners might think the Obama ad approaches the tone of the infamous Mary J. Blige Burger King commercial in which she sings passionately about “crispy chicken” or a thousand different McDonald’s radio ads—always seemingly containing the cliche of a black woman starting a conversation with her best friend by saying, “Girl!…”—featuring black people going way over the top talking about their love for fried hamburger meat.

In reaching out to the black community, sometimes it’s safer to just play it straight and present the facts, rather than trying to incorporate some element of black culture that might come off as patronizing. Listen to the Obama radio commercial HERE and decide for yourself.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top