‘Xenophobic’ Nando’s Ad Pulled Off Air In South Africa

IN AN about-turn, broadcasters e.tv and DStv have pulled from air the latest advertisement by fast-food chain Nando’s.

The South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) has refused to air the advertisement altogether, citing “xenophobic undertones”.

The commercial opens with foreign nationals illegally crossing the South African border, followed by a voice-over that says: “You know what’s wrong with South Africa? It’s all you foreigners.”

It then shows foreign nationals including Chinese, Indians and even Afrikaners disappearing in puffs of smoke. Finally, the only person left is a traditional Khoisan man who says he’s not going anywhere.

Nando’s, which is known for its controversial marketing campaigns, said it was shocked at the decision and planned to ask the broadcasters to reconsider. It argued that the advertisement depicted South Africa’s rich ethnic and cultural diversity and was meant to show the absurdity of xenophobia.

The commercial was initially aired both on e.tv and across DStv channels, and is still available on social network websites.

Thabang Ramogase, marketing manager at Nando’s, said it was told on Tuesday that e.tv and DStv had decided to stop flighting the advertisement.

“We think it is short-sighted and we stand by the advertisement. The responses the ad has generated online have been overwhelmingly positive and show that South Africans get the message,” he said.

Monde Twala, head of channel at e.tv, said the broadcaster had decided on Monday night to stop airing the advertisement.

Mr Twala added that e.tv “respects creativity”, saying the channel had previously flighted advertisements that were rejected by other broadcasters.

“In evaluating the advertisement, e.tv came to the conclusion that it trivialized xenophobia, which remains a sensitive and volatile issue in South Africa,” he said.

He said e.tv reserved the right to withdraw a commercial from the channel on grounds of taste or legality, regardless of whether it had been subject to an ASA ruling.

Chris Hitchings, media sales CEO at DStv, said the pay-TV broadcaster was concerned that the advertisement could be understood incorrectly.

“While we understand that the commercial is a parody, we are not convinced that all our viewers will interpret it in the way intended,” he said. “We have a responsibility not to broadcast material that could be deemed offensive to our viewers and we have exercised our rights in this regard.”

The SABC refused to air the advertisement as it believed it would fuel violence against foreign nationals. Spokesman Kaizer Kganyago said it had overstepped the mark.

“The advertisement starts with ‘you foreigners’,” he said. “By the time they get to the diversity message, people could have interpreted it in any which way. We are a public broadcaster and we will not to broadcast it.”

Leon Grobler, dispute resolutions manager at the ASA, said the organization had received a handful of complaints about the advertisement. Its review will take about a month.

Mr Ramogase of Nando’s said the advertisement should be viewed in context. “We wanted to draw attention to the issue of xenophobia and highlight how ridiculous it is in 2012. We feel the issue is being swept under the carpet and that we need to deal with it.”

He added: “It’s ridiculous to draw the line on who should not be here, but if you go back far enough, then who really should be?”

Mr Ramogase said that Nando’s had expected that some people would be offended, but that was not its intention.

“We don’t just do controversy for controversy’s sake,” he said. “It’s always a role for our product and our brand. We are different and controversial but it’s not controversy in a vacuum. We say things that are on people’s minds.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top