Romney’s Team Thinks He Can Beat Obama in Pennsylvania

Republican challenger Mitt Romney’s campaign strategists believe the weak economy and some of President Obama’s positions that offended Catholics might help Romney have a chance to win Pennsylvania, a state that Democrats have won in the last five presidential elections.

But Romney’s team acknowledges that it’s an uphill climb—polls show Obama ahead, 47 to 39 percent, and Democrats have a huge voter registration advantage. Obama won Pennsylvania by 10 points over McCain in 2008, but Republicans won control of the Pennsylvania legislature in 2010 and proceeded to pass oppressive voting laws in the state that could depress turnout among young people and people of color. For instance, all voters in Pennsylvania will now be required to present an ID that includes an expiration date—a random requirement that could hurt college students without driver’s licenses, since many college IDs don’t contain expiration dates.

While experts predict that Obama will still win Pennsylvania—particularly since the unemployment rate in Pennsylvania is lower than in the rest of the country, and the auto industry bailout that Obama pushed and that Romney opposed is extremely popular in Pennsylvania—the conventional election thinking goes that if Romney requires Obama to spend money and resources in a state that he should be win easily, then that’s money and resources that he won’t be spending elsewhere.

Andrew Reilly, chairman of the Delaware County GOP, told the Associated Press, “Pennsylvania is a challenge. I think Romney’s got a shot.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top