ANC To Withdraw Jacob Zuma Penis Painting Case

IT WOULD not make sense to continue with a court case against Bretty Murray’s painting of President Jacob Zuma , the African National Congress said on Wednesday.

“Indeed, we are no longer taking the Goodman Gallery to court. We are no longer taking City Press to court,” said ANC spokesman Jackson Mthembu.

He was speaking at a joint media briefing between the ANC and the Goodman Gallery, announcing a settlement agreement on the controversial artwork.

Mr Mthembu said now that a settlement had been reached, the court action in the South Gauteng High Court was no longer necessary.

“There is no need for us to continue taking City Press to court, or the Goodman Gallery to court. It would not make sense,” said Mr Mthembu.

Goodman Gallery director Liza Essers said the painting would not be displayed in the gallery because it had been defaced.

The settlement agreement with the ANC did not include an agreement on removing the picture from the Goodman Gallery’s website.

However, she said the image would be taken down from the website at some point.

On Tuesday ANC supporters marched to the Goodman Gallery over the controversial painting, The Spear. Party secretary-general Gwede Mantashe declared the march a “mission accomplished”.

The thousand-strong march kicked off at the Zoo Lake, with poster-carrying protesters bused in from as far afield as Mpumalanga.

It snaked its way through the suburb of Parkview, up Jan Smuts Avenue, which was closed to traffic for its duration, and halted outside the gallery in Rosebank.

Protesters sang and danced as they approached. Some took the opportunity to campaign for Mr Zuma ahead of his battle for a second term at the head of the ANC. “Naked or not, Zuma for second term: Mpumalanga,” read one placard.

The Goodman Gallery, in its response to the ANC memorandum, said it never intended causing hurt or harm to the dignity of anyone.

The ANC went to court to get the painting removed from the gallery, and also took City Press to court because it had published a picture of the painting on its website.

Meanwhile, the Film and Publications Board was expected to decide by the end of the week whether the painting should be classified.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top