LeBron, Wade Silence Critics, Even Series With Pacers

Miami's LeBron James was awesome.

The worst thing that could happen to the Indiana Pacers happened: LeBron James and Dwyane Wade got mad and turned that emotion into a dynamic effort on the court.

The Miami Heat superstar tandem, playing with a synchronized sense of purpose, exploded in Indianapolis in a virtual must-win situation. James had 40 points and Wade 30 (22 points after halftime) as the Heat overcome a 10-point deficit to earn a 101-93 victory that evens the best-of-seven series at 2-2.

James was spectacular, from the perimeter and on daring forays to the basket. He was aided and abetted by Wade, who was a non-factor in Miami’s Game 3 blowout loss Thursday, during which he and coach Eric Spolsetra had a heated exchange on the bench.

Without all-star forward Chris Bosh (strained abdominal), the Heat needed superlative efforts by their top two play and at least another teammate. And that assistance came in the form or Udonis Haslem.  The one-time starter provided 14 points off the bench and had a pair of critical jump shots as the Heat moved in to salt away the game and retake home-court advantage.

Critical Game 5 will b held Tuesday in Miami.

Danny Granger scored 20 to lead the Pacers, who suddenly are in a vulnerable position.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top