Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/News
NewsPolitics

Biden Support of Gay Marriage Could Be an Obama Tactic

Posted byBy Nick Chiles | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

As the White House continues to deal with the questions and controversy from Vice President Joe Biden’s comments on Sunday that he was “absolutely comfortable” with gay marriage, a new school of thought is emerging that perhaps President Obama and his aides intended for Biden to make his feelings known.

Most observers have taken Biden’s words to be a mistake, another slip of the tongue from a man with a long history of shooting from the lip and getting himself into trouble. After Biden’s appearance on “Meet the Press,” Obama spokesman Jay Carney reiterated that the president’s views on gay marriage are still “evolving” and he is not yet a firm supporter—though he does support legal gay “unions.”

But by allowing Biden to state his support—in addition to Education Secretary Arne Duncan, a close friend of the president’s from Chicago who has also publicly stated his support for gay marriage—the White House may be able to pull off a win-win scenario: signal to liberals and gays that the administration is in support of gay marriage, but not go all the way there and potentially alienate Obama supporters in more conservative states where it’s not a popular position.

To emphasize the riskiness of the president supporting gay marriage, one need only look at North Carolina—a state the White House believes may be in play in November—where voters yesterday overwhelmingly passed a constitutional ban on gay marriage, 61 percent to 39 percent.

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top