Celtics Toy With The Hawks, Push Them To The Edge

The Celtics had lots to cheer in their romp over the Hawks.

It is not over yet for the Atlanta Hawks, but it sure does not look promising for the team that opened its first-round series against the Boston Celtics with home-court advantage. After a win to open the series, the Hawks have dropped three straight, including Sunday night’s humiliation, 101-79, in Boston.

And so, the Celtics lead the series 3-1 when just last week they were in not in a good position. To wit: They had lost Game 1 and their floor general, Rajon Rondo, was suspended for Game 2 for bumping into a referee. But the Hawks failed to take advantage of their advantages. They lost Game 2 at home against the Rondo-less Celtics, fell in Game 3 without injured Josh Smith (knee) and basically did not show up Sunday night — even though Smith returned as well as Al Horford, who missed much of the season with a pectoral injury.

The Celtics raced out to a 37-point lead in the third quarter behind forward Paul Pierce, who had 24 in 18 minutes. He did tweat a knee, but it is not thought to be serious enough to keep him out of Thursday’s Game 5. Rondo was typically awesome: 20 points and 16 assists in leading the Boston assault.

 

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top