Charlie Sheen: "I'm Tired Of Lying, I'm Tired Of Pretending Ashton Doesn't Suck"

When Charlie Sheen has something to say, everyone should know by now that he’s going to say it. The actor finally let his true feelings out on what he really thinks of his former sitcom Two and a Half Men.

While talking to TMZ Live yesterday, the Money Talks star said bluntly, “I’m tired of lying. I’m tired of pretending the show doesn’t suck. I’m tired of pretending Ashton doesn’t suck. I’m tired of pretending they’re not completely adrift.”

Sheen continued his rant, as he cleared up the fact that he wasn’t personally attacking Kutcher.

“I just feel bad for him. He’s saddled with such bad writing.” Admitting he had been watching the show, he added “It’s kind of leaving your child behind with somebody and them not really taking good care of it.”

“Perhaps if Warner Bros. spent as much time and energy focusing on THEIR show, it wouldn’t be such a steaming pile of a**”, Sheen said.

It was this kind of loose talk that got Sheen fired from CBS’ Two And A Half Men back in March of 2011.

Two and a Half Men is an American television sitcom that premiered on CBS on September 22, 2003. Its original cast was Sheen, Jon Cryer, and Angus T. Jones.

Ashton Kutcher replaced Sheen after he was terminated.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top