Bill Murray Refuses Ghostbusters 3 Call; Role To Be Recast

Bill Murray will not be taking calls to fight ghosts in another installment of the Ghostbusters franchise. The actor and comedian  has apparently retired his ghost-busting uniform for good.

According to Empire magazine, the funny man has said, “No one wants to pay money to see fat, old men chasing ghosts.”

Writer and star Dan Aykroyd has hinted that the planned second sequel to Ghostbusters may move forward without its biggest star, Bill Murray.

Without going into details in an Empire magazine webchat,  Aykroyd suggested that Murray’s character, Peter Venkman, might have to be recast. He also responded to rumors about Murray shredding the latest revision of the script to show his disapproval of another Ghostbusters being made.

“We have a deep, private personal relationship that transcends business. We communicate frequently and his position on the involvement in Ghostbusters 3 has been made clear and I respect that. But Bill has too much positive estimation of my writing skills to shred the work,” Aykroyd said.

If and when “Ghostbusters 3” does move into production, and with or without Murray, it appears Aykroyd is committed to the success of the long time coming project.

“The script must be perfect. We cannot release a film that is any less than that,” he said. “We have more work to do.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top