Denzel Washington Says He Paved The Way For Jamie Foxx And Forest Whitaker

In a recent interview with The Obeserver, Denzel Washington talks about how his two Oscars accolades during his career may have impacted the Academy Awards and made them more aware of what other African-American actors are doing in the field.

“You have to have a part to play, first, that’s the bottom line. You don’t get nominated unless you have a great role to play and you interpret the role well. So maybe it shifted voters’ attention to what certain African-Americans were doing. What Jamie Foxx did in Ray was phenomenal, it couldn’t be denied.”

The A-list actor goes on to say:

“I think Forest winning was a bit more of a surprise. Jamie was almost a phenomenon – he was Ray. The fact that I’d won a couple of years earlier, maybe that did help for white voters to say, ‘Hey, look at Jamie Foxx over here,’ when they may not have prior to that.”

Thereafter, the Safe House star admits that he hardly likes any of the scripts that he receives, because they don’t make sense to him.

“Nine times out of nine the script is not there, to my liking. And I’m a logic monster. If things don’t make sense, I gotta make sense out of them, and then you get into the process.”

Denzel Washington’s latest movie Safe House is now playing in theaters.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top