Rihanna Spurs Debate With Tupac Tattoo

UPDATE-Is Rihanna’s Tupac tattoo real or fake? RiRi tweeted a picture showing off her knuckles with the inscription ‘Thug Life.’ If you’re too new school, the term ‘Thug Life’ was inspired by the late California rapper 2pac, real name, Tupac Shakur and was tattooed across his abdomen.

The debate has once again began over Rihanan’s duty as a role model and perhaps more importantly her state of being. Is she heading towards a downward spiral? Upon first glance the choice of words and placement of the tattoo seems highly irresponsible for a pop star of her caliber – and it may be! Unknown to many there is a deeper meaning, at least in Tupac’s mind about the definition of the word: “Thug Life is the opposite of someone having all he needs to succeed. Thug life is when you have nothing, and succeed, when you have overcome all obstacles to reach your aim.” Tupac also died after being shot four times in 1996 at the age of 25.

So is the tattoo real? Late last year when Rihanna’s LOUD tour stopped in Brazil she was photographed on her balcony with the inscription on her knuckles – it is believed Thug Life was only written with a marker at that time. It’s safe to say the We Found Love singer was contemplating getting the real deal. After enjoying a long, sexy vacation in Hawaii it appears the pop star went through with it. Further evidence are bandages seen around Rihanna’s fingers when she posed for a picture with actor Danny Trejo – see below.

Somewhere there is still hope that it’s fake and was done to spark controversy….hopefully

Do you think Rihanna’s tattoo is real?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top