Rihanna Responds To Dutch Magazine Slur; Prompts Editor's Resignation

Jackie magazine editor in chief Eva Koeke was forced to resign after receiving heavy backlash from Rihanna and   many, many others after referring to the Man Down star as a ‘N*gga B*tch’.   The Dutch magazine was bombarded with emails, tweets and Facebook posts after reports surfaced that Eva approved a racially charged write up on Rihanna. The fashion post poked fun at Rihanna’s ‘ghetto ass, porn heels and even her Jamaican winters.’ Despite the fact that Rihanna’s from Barbados. Rihanna responded to the magazine post calling it ‘disrespectful’ and ‘desperate’. In the latest update, Eva has confirmed her resignation with her letter on Facebook:

“I realize that my first reaction on Twitter, where I indicated that it was a joke, was an incomplete description of what I, and also the author of the article referred. The term ‘n–a b–h’ h” has come over from America and we have only this to describe this particular style of clothes that we can try to interpret. Due to the enormous pressure from social media, I promised to do better regarding the language in future issues of Jackie and I have offered to rectify the situation.”

“I have now come to the conclusion that rectification is not the right solution. I regret that I have taken too quickly positions on an item in Jackie — which incidentally had no underlying racial motive. In the course of events I went with, the publisher came to the conclusion that, now that my credibility is affected, it’s better for all parties if I immediately lay down my duties as editor. After my eight years giving my heart and soul for Jackie, I realize that these errors — although not malicious intent — are a reason for leaving. “

Eva still maintains her intentions are not meant to harm Rihanna, but that wasn’t good enough. Share your thoughts…

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top