Charlie Sheen Has A Twitter Induced Cellphone Melt Down

A few days ago, Charlie Sheen accidentally tweeted his personal cellphone number. The mistake happened when the ‘Money Talk’ star tried to direct-message Justin Bieber.

Sheen was sitting at a restaurant and tried to privately contact the singer, tweeting “310-954-7277 Call me bro. C,” not his 5 million followers who saw the message by mistake.

A witness at the restaurant said: “Charlie’s phone immediately went into meltdown. It was ringing wildly, and he got 1,800 text messages in minutes. Charlie saw the funny side and answered the phone a few times, saying things like ‘Ray’s Pizza’ and ‘Winning’. His phone just continued ringing and buzzing and eventually just completely melted down. Charlie was like, ‘I guess I need a new phone.’ Charlie was the most polite in the group. At one point, he started getting out a cigarette. One of his friends told him, ‘You are Charlie Sheen, you can do whatever you want,’ but the restaurant manager told him that was not the case, and Charlie put his cigarette away.”

After being unsuccessful at contacting the actor directly,  his rep said that “I haven’t been able to get through to him on the phone since Wednesday. He just got a new number.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top