Kim Kardashian Shifts Blame To Kris Humphries For Their Divorce

UPDATE-Breaking news: Kim Kardashian‘s 72 day marriage can be blamed on Kris Humphries!! Kim and Kris only enjoyed 72 days of wedded bliss but if you consider the marriage was doomed before it started, that number dwindles to zero. So who is to blame?

Much of the backlash has fallen at Kim Kardashian’s feet with Kris shouldering none of the blame if not receiving the sympathy vote. Not anymore. The Kardashian’s new reality show ‘Kourtney & Kim Take New York’ premieres on Sunday and as if on cue the promotion wheel starts rolling. Since bashing Kim K is out of the question, the next best option is her now estranged husband Kris Humphries and his vile treatment of Kim. Though based on the episode clips it wasn’t that hard.

US Weekly’s latest cover reads, ‘Husband From Hell’. In the issue a source recounts the many moments Kris has spoken down to his wife.

“He belittled her in front of people. He’d call her stupid. It was truly sickening,” says the source.

“He tried to control Kim by bringing her down…He would say truly terrible things. One time, he said she had no talent and her fame wouldn’t last.” And the list goes on….

Is shifting the blame to Kris Humphries a smart tactic by the Kardashian clan?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top