Salma Hayek's Husband Fathers Two Children In The Same Year

Salma Hayek’s billionaire husband Francois Henri Pinault fathered a child with former supermodel Linda Evangelista in the same year he fathered Salma’s now four year old daughter. In case you’re not sure who’s Linda Evangelista – she’s the model who famously refused to get out of bed for anything less than $10,000 – the girl’s got ambitions huh!

So it didn’t take 13 years to surface and Salma and her billionaire husband wasn’t married at the time (like Arnold and Maria) – but something about this story is soo scandalous!

Here’s the scoop: Francois was dating Linda in 2006, Francois met and began dating Salma also in 2006. Sometime that year Francois impregnates Linda but they break up (maybe) later that year Francois also impregnates Salma (who he just met that same year). Linda has her son in 2007 and refuses to name the father. Linda even lies and tells the New York Post that the father is a New York architect (we’re really hoping this person doesn’t exist – poor sucker if he does). Salma gives birth to her daughter in 2007 and counts that as Francois’ third child – it includes his two children from a previous marriage.

(Linda Evangelista)

Salma gets Francois to put a ring on it – Linda failed in this department. But two years later in 2008 Salma calls off the engagement. We’re guessing because the cat got out of the bag. Salma reconsiders and she and the billionaire wed in 2009.

Fast forward and Linda Evangelista is spotted leaving family court after failing to reach a custody agreement with non other than the billionaire.

Sigh, is it even worth to ask why a billionaire would not protect his assets and impregnate two women in the same year – one who he just met?!?! But the larger question is why would Linda keep his name a secret and find herself fighting a child support battle with a billionaire?! And of course, did Salma Hayek know the billionaire’s secret?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top