Does Stacey Dash 'Single Ladies' Character Speak For Other Women?

Does Stacey Dash’s character on VH1’s “Single Ladies” speak for other women? In the third episode of “Single Ladies” Stacey Dash’s character Val is still adjusting to her newly single life when her girlfriend April sets her up with an old friend.

April’s friend Blake is everything Val was looking for; assertive, smart, tall, dark and handsome. Blake and Val hit it off very quickly. He soon offers Val the option to prepare the same full course meal he will prepare for a chef job he’s hoping to land in Atlanta. Val and Blake had great chemistry while the two flirted heavily in the kitchen. After a tasty meal, Blake continues to impress Val when he offers to wash the plates. The two find themselves on the couch with Blake hoping to get Val to break her 6-month rule. The same rule she broke in the previous episode following her break-up…I digress.

Blake gets kissy with Val while he mouths out where he plans to kiss next. Val gives him a nudge below the navel hoping he’ll take the bait – pun intended. Blake puts the   kibosh on going down under saying, “I don’t do that.” A puzzled Val looks in horror as Blake states it’s “natural” for a woman to do the favor for a man but not the opposite. Val quickly kicks Blake out telling him “you need to give to receive”. And just like that, the previously perfect Blake was no more.

While Blake’s rational for not going down under was very foolish – is it truly a deal breaker? Do you agree with Stacey Dash “Single Ladies” character Val?

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top