Kelly Rowland's Father Seeks To Reconcile

Kelly Rowland‘s father, Christoper Lovett is seeking to reconcile with his now famous daughter. The new X-Factor judge (pictured at the X-Factor auditions in Manchester) lost contact with her father at the age of 7 when the family was evicted from their home.

Christopher Lovett, now 65, is trying again after many failed attempts and a renewed life after alcoholism to reconcile with Kelly. Christoper tells the Sunday Mirror about his attempt to contact Kelly after a Destiny’s Child concert in 2000,

“I sat for the whole concert in one of the cheap seats at the back with tears of joy and utter despair  ­rolling down my face. I wrote a note and begged a security guard to pass it to her. It said, ‘Darling I have been looking for you. I am so proud of you and I love you so much and I just long to tell you that in  ­person. Love Dad’. But no matter how much I begged the guard he would not believe I was her father.

He continues,

“No parent should scream and shout in front of their child, and I am sorry to say there were too many times to  ­mention that Kelly heard me  ­screaming abuse at her mother. Sometimes she would run to her  ­bedroom screaming, others she would cling to my trouser leg begging abe to stop.”

Christopher insist that he’s not reaching out to Kelly because she’s famous,

“I own a big home now and have retired so I don’t want any of Kelly’s fortune, I just want her love. I’m getting old now – I just hope she reads this and doesn’t leave getting back in touch with me before it is too late.”

Should Kelly Rowland reconcile with her father?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top