Target Audience: Was Data Breach Worse Than Reported?

target-breach

Target Corp. revealed that last year’s massive security breach could have been more extensive than reported so far, leading to further losses at the No. 3 U.S. retailer.

“Our investigation of the matter is ongoing and it is possible that we will identify additional information that was accessed or stolen, which could materially worsen the losses and reputational damage we have experienced,” the company said in its 10-K annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday.

According to reuters.com, Target has so far reported that some 40 million payment card records were stolen along with 70 million other customer records during a massive cyber attack over the holiday shopping season.

For example, the SEC filing noted that when the company initially identified the intrusion in mid-December, investigators believed the information stolen was limited to some 40 million payment card records. They later discovered that another 70 million pieces of customer data had been taken.

The Minneapolis-based retailer has  stated that news of the breach has damaged its reputation, causing some customers to stay away and hurting sales.

Target executives are unsure how long it might take to restore the company’s reputation, the filing said. “We cannot predict the length or extent of any ongoing impact to sales.”

When the company reported quarterly results on February 26, it said customer traffic had started to improve this year after falling significantly on news of the cyber attack, which surfaced in mid-December.

Congress is investigating the breach along with potential lapses at other retailers, and credit card companies are pushing for better security.

Target faces dozens of class actions and potential action from banks seeking reimbursement for millions of dollars in losses due to fraud and the cost of card replacements.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top