‘Holy Cow’: Trump Kisses Female Staffer In Front of the World, Then His Comment About Her Parents Takes an Unexpected Turn

Donald Trump spent nearly two minutes gushing over a young female staffer at an Oklahoma rally.

Then he brought up her looks and her parents, and the moment got weird.

It started as a lengthy shout-out to someone who has become a familiar presence in Trump’s inner circle. Margo Martin is also an Oklahoma native who grew up in Ada, giving Trump another reason to single her out before the crowd gathered in Durant.

Trump’s water-tossing demonstration in Texas left viewers baffled and sparked another wave of scrutiny over his behavior. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The president was campaigning Thursday, Oct. 1, for Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Mazzei.

The appearance was part of a broader push to energize GOP voters before the Nov. 3 midterm elections.

‘He Can’t Help Himself’: Trump Drops Bizarre Compliment About Young Athlete on Live TV Then Takes an Unexpected Shot at His Bloodline With One Line

Thousands packed the Choctaw Event Center, with some supporters waiting hours in the rain. Trump eventually turned his attention to 31-year-old communications adviser Margo Martin.

According to The Washington Post, Martin regularly captures and posts behind-the-scenes footage of Trump and his appearances. He called her a social media “sensation” and praised her loyalty before turning his attention to her appearance.

Where Natalie Harp earned the label “Human Printer,” Martin’s “Human iPhone” implies a far bigger role.

Trump said Martin was known for several things. He then joked there was one thing he could not mention because it might end his political career.

“You can never say that a woman is beautiful,” Trump said, before doing exactly that. “But, I’ll say it anyway, she is a beautiful woman, inside and out.”

Trump then insisted the seemingly reluctant Martin join him onstage.

“Look at this. Look at this,” he said. “And I’m not allowed … I’m not allowed to say she’s beautiful. You believe that? She is beautiful. But she’s beautiful inside and out, and she’s been so loyal.”

Martin greeted her parents from the stage with a coy, “Hi, Mom and Dad.”

That was when Trump made a bizarre connection between Martin’s looks, her parents and horses.

“I see why she’s good-looking, actually,” Trump said. “You know, I believe in the racehorse theory. Fast horses, right? Great mom and dad. Thank you very much. Great job, Margo.”

Then came another moment that got people talking.

A photo of Trump kissing Martin on the cheek, just missing her mouth as she turns her lips away, circulated on social media, and commenters wasted little time weighing in on his “creepy” comments and the kiss.

“Holy s—t that man is nasty,” one person wrote. Another added, “Being horny all the time and having dementia is a bad combination.”

Someone else joked, “BLECH!!! WHERE’S NATALIE? SHE’S GONNA SCRATCH YOUR EYES OUT.”

Another person focused on Martin’s reaction and asked, “Is that an engagement ring she’s wearing? She really doesn’t look happy to me.”

For some observers, the interaction recalled another awkward encounter involving Trump and a teenager at a rally almost a decade ago.

A resurfaced 2019 video shows Trump with college student activist Laura Schoeck at a Turning Point USA event. After Schoeck spoke, she started to leave the stage. Trump pulled her back toward him and leaned toward her cheek. Schoeck briefly leaned forward before stopping, pulling away and exiting the stage.

Martin was not the only person the Queens native wanted to kiss. He also mentioned wanting to kiss two male supporters for their kind words, then affirmed he wasn’t attracted to them, despite their good looks.

Still, some critics focused more on Trump’s breeding analogy than the kiss.

“Margo Martin just got embarrassed. Trump: ‘Mom and Dad are here, hello Mom and Dad I see why she is good-looking; actually I believe in the [race horse] theory…fast horses, right,’” one person wrote.

It was hardly the first time Trump has invoked his so-called “racehorse theory.”

At a 2020 Minnesota rally, Trump told a predominantly white crowd, “You have good genes.” He continued, “A lot of it is about the genes, isn’t it? Don’t you believe? The racehorse theory. You think we’re so different?”

Critics have often connected those remarks to eugenics and discredited ideas about inherited superiority.

Genetics have remained a recurring theme in Trump’s public remarks.

In August, Trump praised 16-year-old lifeguard Ryder Williams for rescuing a child. Looking at Williams, Trump told his mother, “It’s good genetics when you look at him; you can see.”

More recently, Trump praised Texas quarterback Arch Manning, nephew of Peyton and Eli, saying, “If you’re gonna go for genetics, you can’t do much better.”

Trump has also used genetic language in a far more controversial context.

During the 2024 presidential campaign, he discussed undocumented immigrants convicted of crimes and suggested murder could be “in their genes.” His campaign later said Trump was specifically referring to murderers, not migrants generally.

That history gave Trump’s apparent compliment to Martin another layer. This time, Trump connected his employee’s beauty to her parents and invoked his familiar breeding analogy. Then came the kiss.

What started as an extended shout-out to an Oklahoma native quickly became something else for viewers online.

The combination of beauty, bloodlines and an affectionate gesture gave social media another Trump moment to dissect.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top