‘Wait a Minute!’: Trump’s Bizarre Photo with Xi Sparks a Firestorm After Fans Zoom In on the Woman Behind Him — Then the Original Photo Surfaces

President Donald Trump and a fellow world leader revived a growing scandal that has kept the White House scrambling for months.

Trump, 80, shared a bizarre image on his Truth Social platform to recap the first day of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit.

The photo has the internet doing double takes after people mistook one woman for one of his most loyal staffers.

U.S. President Donald Trump has the internet in investigative mode after sharing a photo with Chinese President Xi and a woman who looks like Natalie Harp. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Trump welcomed Xi with a 100-foot red carpet and a military band as two B-1 bombers flew overhead during the arrival ceremony on Sept. 23.

The U.S. president and first lady Melania Trump stood below Xi’s plane as he and his wife, Peng Liyuan, exited.

‘Holy Cow’: White House Tried to Edit Trump’s Embarrassing Video — But It Was Too Late Eagle-Eyed Fans Zeroed In on Background and Found What They Cut

The two couples posed for photographers together on the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. The respective national anthems were playing in the background.

The viral image Trump shared shows him saluting as a slightly smirking Xi stands before an “Air China” plane.

The words “Only Trump” appear above their heads, with 13 stars behind them. Other details raised red flags and left many wondering if the image was AI-generated.

Internet users pointed out the plane at the top of the image and that Trump had one glove on his hand, instead of two. One person even noticed, “They slimmed him down by 50 lbs.”

“Generated using AI. It’s interesting that a N. Harp ended up there too,” noted a second person.

Many assumed the image showed Trump’s close confidante standing off to the side.

If Harp could have sent the doctored photo of Trump and Xi, fingers pointed to the president’s blond executive assistant, Natalie Harp.

Outspoken Trump critic Aaron Rupar was among the first online users to assume the image showed Harp with Trump and Xi.

About 10 minutes later, he called “AI slop,” opening the floodgates for other X users to offer their takes on the peculiar posting on Trump’s page. Harp was a main target of the onslaught.

One person speculated, “So – Natalie was mad that Melania was there – edited her out, put herself in, and posted it on Trump’s Truth Social account. Totally normal behavior if you are Glenn Close’s character from ‘Fatal Attraction.’” 

Another said, “WHAT?!? Wait a minute. She has access to his socials too. She posts for him. She did that I bet. She needs help.”

Much later, Rupar discovered the original image, adding, “So this story is WAY wilder than I thought.”

“But there is one key difference — MONICA CROWLEY’S FACE HAS BEEN EDITED TO LOOK LIKE NATALIE HARP’S. WTF is going on here?”

He confessed that the woman in the image was Monica Crowley, the State Department’s chief of protocol. Rupar also claimed someone edited the image to make the face look like Harp’s.

Some also noted that the AI edit removed Crowley’s facial hair, making her look more like Harp.

“You can tell who made it,” a third individual admitted. Another said, “Plagiarizer, Monica Crowley gets AI cropped by Natalie Harp? I smell a blond cat fight. Doesn’t [Melania] have a dog in this fight?”

This latest ordeal involving Harp follows accusations that the White House cropped her out of a previous photo during the Freedom 250 Grand Prix in August. Melania stood by Trump’s side at that sporting event in Washington, D.C.

Rumors of a behind-the-scenes turf war between Melania and Natalie gained more fuel after Trump’s breakfast-time Truth Social post.

The likelihood of more drama playing out over Trump and Natalie’s closeness seems to be inescapable.

View on Threads

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top