‘It Is Welcomed’: Rev. Al Sharpton Not Backing Down After Lawyers for Nolan Wells’ Friends Threaten to Sue Him for Defamation

Rev. Al Sharpton is daring three of Nolan Wells’ friends to follow through on their attorneys’ threat to sue him for defamation.

Attorneys Edward Andrew Paltzik and J. Tyler Cox are representing Warren Hudson, Jax Pitalo, and Morgan Seymour.

The attorneys notified Sharpton of their plans to sue in a letter filed Friday, giving him time to “retract and delete every false and defamatory statement about them,” according to the Sun Herald.

Rev. Al Sharpton fires back after Nolan Wells’ friends threaten to sue him for defamation (Photos: AP/Kevin Hagen, The Officer Tatum Show).

Defamation Claims

In the letter, the attorneys allege that Sharpton defamed the trio during an interview with TMZ on July 14.

During that interview, Sharpton questioned why Wells went missing without his phone and pointed to potential wrongdoing, saying there were “too many unanswered questions.”

Black Communities Are Being Watched More by Flock Cameras—Even as Cops Are Accused of Misusing the System to Spy on People They Know

“One, he’s missing without a cell phone,” Sharpton said. “Two, you lie about whether or not you had the cell phone and the (Nolan’s) keys. And three, everything is erased from the cell phone. That’s too many unanswered questions for us not to say that something is amiss here.”

Wells went missing after spending July 4 with friends on Horn Island in Mississippi. Authorities found his body two days later in the same place he went missing.

The attorneys’ letter highlighted statements Sharpton made at the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) convention, as well as during an Aug. 19 virtual prayer vigil hosted by the National Action Network on what would have been Wells’ 19th birthday.

The attorneys claim in those remarks Sharpton was referring to Hudson, Pitalo and Seymour.

“You falsely accused these three completely innocent young men of extremely serious wrongdoing that constitutes multiple felonies under Mississippi law, including, but not limited to: Murder, hindering prosecution in the first degree and tampering with physical evidence,” the letter said.

Sharpton Responds

Sharpton said he would have his lawyers contact the attorneys so they could serve him with the lawsuit.

“I did not know their names, so I did not defame them, we have a right and a duty to raise questions that were raised to me by Nolan’s parents,” Sharpton said in a statement.

Sharpton said he welcomes a lawsuit because it could force everyone who was with Wells before his death to answer questions under oath and allow for “depositions, discovery and a full examination of the facts.”

He said he joined Wells’ parents, Christine and Elmore Wonsley, in seeking the truth about their son’s death and demanding a transparent, accountable investigation.

“If a lawsuit is a catalyst for the truth, then it is welcomed and it will not deter NAN or me from continuing to stand with the family in their pursuit of justice,” Sharpton wrote.

The Jackson County Sheriff’s Office continues to investigate Wells’ death and will present its findings to a grand jury, which will determine whether criminal charges are warranted.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top