‘You Think I’m That Stupid!’: Michigan Woman Logs Into Zoom Court Hearing from Behind the Wheel, Then Tries to Lie to the Judge About It, and He Let’s Her Have It

A Zoom court hearing is going viral after a Detroit woman joined the call while she was driving, then lied to the judge about it.

Local reports state that Kimberly Carroll was late to her virtual court call with Judge Michael K. McNally regarding an outstanding debt that a debt collection company was seeking to default her on.

Kimberly Carroll logged into her Zoom court hearing from behind the wheel. When the judge asked her if she was driving, she lied about it. (Photos: Screenshots/WJBK)

According to WJBK, when Carroll finally joined the court session, she switched on her camera, which presumably showed her operating a motor vehicle.

“You cannot be driving, ma’am,” McNally said. “What are you doing?”

‘I Was Never Stopped’: White Man Admits He Broke the Law Daily With Zero Consequences—Then Points to the Moment a Black Father Was Hunted Down and Killed

“I’m not driving, I’m a passenger in a car,” Carroll responds while looking from the camera to the road.

McNally asserted that he does not proceed with court hearings while people are driving or riding in cars, and Carroll tells him that she will “pull over.”

She informs the judge that she is heading out of town for a family emergency, but says she will have her “driver” pull over.

“Am I crazy, or does it not look like you’re driving that car?” the judge asks, looking closely at Carroll’s movements.

“I’m not driving the car, I’m a passenger in the car, sir,” Carroll insists.

“Which side of the car are you on?” McNally probes.

“I’m on the left-hand side,” Carroll answers absent-mindedly.

“How would you be on the left-hand side if you’re a passenger in the front seat? Am I missing something?” the judge asks.

Carroll quickly tries to recover from the gaffe.

“Left-hand- right-hand side. I’m sorry, I’ve been sitting in a room, I didn’t know,” she states while turning away from the camera and smirking.

McNally isn’t convinced.

“Let me see the driver,” he says.

Carroll pauses for a moment to think, and McNally repeats the request: “Let me see the driver. Now!”

“Hang on one second. I have to ask their permission,” Carroll answers, before stepping out of the car.

“You were on the driver’s side. You think I’m that stupid?” McNally declares before making a default judgment in Carroll’s case. “You lied to me.”

This case is almost a carbon copy of another viral Zoom court hearing nearly two years ago in Michigan, in which another judge blasted a man for driving with a suspended license.

The May 2024 hearing addressed Corey Harris’ license suspension, but Harris carelessly logged into the session just as he was pulling into the parking lot of his doctor’s office. When the judge called him out on it, Harris sat in the driver’s seat speechless.

It was later discovered that Harris actually never owned a license.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top