‘Who’s Going to Tell Her?’: Karoline Leavitt Mocked for Congratulating Dead President on Teaming Up with Trump

The internet is having a field day over Karoline Leavitt’s unintentionally hilarious statement about the renaming of the Kennedy Center.

On Dec. 19, workers added President Donald Trump’s name to the façade of the legendary performing arts complex in Washington, one day after the board voted to change the name to the “Trump-Kennedy Center.”

Karoline Leavitt Mocked for Congratulating Dead President on Teaming Up with Trump
US White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt does a TV interview outside the White House in Washington, DC, on December 16, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)

Opened in 1971, the “John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts” was envisioned as a memorial to the assassinated former president, honoring his contributions to the arts. Kennedy’s death was one of the most defining events of the 20th century, but that bit of history seemingly escaped Leavitt, as she appeared not to realize he was dead.

‘Make Him Cry’: Gavin Newsom Obliterates Trump’s Televised Address With a Two-Letter Takedown That Hit a Nerve with MAGA

In a congratulatory note to both presidents, she wrote on X: “Congratulations to President Donald J. Trump, and likewise, congratulations to President Kennedy, because this will be a truly great team long into the future! The building will no doubt attain new levels of success and grandeur.”

Independent journalist Aaron Rupar responded to the note with an earnest question for the White House press secretary, “Karoline, are you aware that President Kennedy is no longer with us?”

“His death was under-reported,” teased one, followed by a joke that he secretly “lives in Antarctica with Elvis and Bruce Lee.”

Reading between the lines of her confusing statement, one person quipped: “There’s only one way for them to be a great team…”

People were having way too much fun at her expense, flooding X with memes and nonstop jokes. “She probably thinks the center was named after the current Health Secretary,” said one, referring to JFK’s nephew, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Another comment simply read, “Make it stop.”

Leavitt’s post was also slapped with a community note on X to correct another error in her short announcement. It turns out that the Kennedy Center board does not have the authority to officially change the name, as the memorial is legally protected under federal law and has a statutory designation.

According to legal experts, a new law passed by both chambers of Congress and signed by the president would be needed to change the name officially, news outlets reported.

Six Democratic lawmakers, all ex officio members of the Kennedy Center board, signed a statement decrying Trump’s stunt. It read in part, “We will be unwavering in our commitment to holding this Administration accountable.”

For now, Leavitt’s statement is prompting hundreds of posts and comments remarking on the press secretary’s apparent cluelessness.

“‘This will be a truly great team,’ One is a real estate developer, and the other has been dead for 62 years,” wrote one on X. “The synergy is going to be electric.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top