‘Disgraceful Manipulation’: Fox Accused of Covering Up Loud Boos for Donald Trump at the Super Bowl with Fake Crowd Cheers

In the before times, whenever there was a dispute about an event video was seen as the great arbiter.

But as technology has progressed, doctoring video (and audio) is as common as a bad call by an umpire. In short, “proof” can be easily manipulated.

Donald Trump Under Slammed for ‘Outrageous’ Cost of Super Bowl Appearance on Public Dime
FEBRUARY 09: (L-R) New Orleans Saints owner Gayle Benson, U.S. President Donald Trump, and Ivanka Trump look on during Super Bowl LIX at Caesars Superdome on February 09, 2025, in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)

Which is to say: Who knows whether Donald Trump was booed or cheered when introduced Sunday at the Super Bowl?

One amateur sleuth, John O’Connell, made a persuasive and widely shared case that “Trump at the Superbowl was soundly booed and hissed. Heard clearly international coverage and commented on in multiple countries.”

The American viewers who watched on Fox, which carried the Super Bowl, didn’t hear the boos because the pro-Trump network overlayed canned “cheers,” O’Connell surmised.

When challenged, O’Connell posted a video recorded by “someone who was actually there.” One problem: The account of the person who recorded it is inactive.

Maybe it’s the work of the X owner, Elon Musk, who is known to censor content he does not like. Maybe O’Connell and the thousands of others who shared the video were hoodwinked.

But the video, taken of Trump as he saluted during the singing of the national anthem by Jon Batiste, was clearly shot from inside the Super Bowl, and it showed a mixture of cheers and boos. That’s important to note, as many have tended not to make the distinction that before Trump was shown on the Jumbotron, he was introduced during pregame festivities. Each appearance produced a different reaction, or so we think.

The second video, shot when Trump was on the field, was more hostile toward the president. One fan can be heard yelling “Thank You, Donald” to the president, followed by another shouting “Traitor.” Boos followed though it’s unclear if they were directed at the president or the guy calling him a traitor.

“Sky News just showed it but edited out any booing disgraceful manipulation,” one person replied.

Of course, there is some wish casting involved. Judging from his X timeline, O’Connell, for example, is rabidly anti-Trump. The second video, meanwhile, was posted from the account “Occupy Democrats.”

A warm reception for Trump should’ve been expected. His approval rating has never been higher. The wider culture has embraced him (players kneeling in solidarity with Black Lives Matter protesters have been replaced by players celebrating with the “Trump dance”).

He won a majority of the vote in the state where the game was played (Lousiana) and the states where the two teams play (Pennsylvania and Missouri). So, it was a home-state advantage for the president.

Trump, of course, only heard cheers. He even suggested that the unmistakable boos directed at Taylor Swift were because she endorsed Kamala Harris in 2024. (“MAGA is very unforgiving,” he wrote on Truth Social.)

In the end, it seems Trump was both booed and cheered. So both sides are right (or wrong, depending on how you cast such things).

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top