‘I Don’t Like A Lot of What He Says or Does’: Dr. Phil Walks Back Donald Trump Endorsement With Shocking Admission It Was an ‘Act of Rebellion’ After Kamala Harris Refused ’25-Plus’ Interview Requests

Dr. Phil McGraw wants his political affiliation to remain a secret. But critics find that hard to believe days after his controversial speech defending Donald Trump against nearly a decade of being called a political bully.

The talk show host offered up during an Oct. 27 Madison Square Garden rally for the GOP presidential candidate that the businessman-turned-politician is actually a great debater who sometimes resorts to name-calling.

Now, in a new interview for “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” the psychologist — who stopped renewing his license to practice in 2006 — claims his perceived endorsement of the cantankerous figure was misconstrued.

Dr. Phil says his speech at Donald Trump rally was an “act of rebellion” after being snubbed a sit-down with Kamala Harris. (Photos: PBS News Hour/YouTube; Piers Morgan Uncensored/YouTube.)

“That was an act of rebellion on my part,” Dr. Phil told host Piers Morgan in a promotional clip circulated hours before their discussion premiered on YouTube on Nov. 5, Election Day.

“I’m just not here to endorse Donald Trump,” he added, noting, “I do not like celebrity endorsements.” It is a sentiment echoed in his speech.

Speaking to the crowd of MAGA supporters, Dr. Phil continued, “I’m here to talk to and stand up for the people who have declared their support for Donald J. Trump, or they get found out, or they want to do it but they’re too intimidated. They get canceled, intimidated, marginalized, excluded, or even boycotted.”

However, the “We’ve Got Issues: How You Can Stand Strong for America’s Soul and Sanity” author shared with Morgan that he felt rebuffed after being denied multiple opportunities to speak with Vice President Kamala Harris. So he showed up for Trump.

“I requested 25-plus times to speak to Kamala Harris and never got so much a yes, no, maybe,” he said.

Dr. Phil also claimed that well-placed Democrats could vouch that he would not have tried to unleash an “ambush interview.” Harris’ team is said to have been concerned about McGraw’s past of cross-examining interviewees.

Moreover, the Daytime Emmy Award winner said that he “offered to give the identical speech at a Harris rally,” even offering to provide a transcript of his remarks in advance.

Harris, the Democratic candidate, has utilized a star-studded roster of guest speakers at campaign events ranging from Barack and Michelle Obama, Kelly Rowland, Beyoncé, Alicia Keys, and Oprah Winfrey, to name just a few who made appearances. 

Winfrey took a digital lashing when McGraw enraged liberal voters and organizations centered on the advancement of people of color with his presumed Trump alliance. The mogul ushered him into the spotlight with numerous guest stints on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” during the 1990s. She leveraged her brand to help him build his own with the launch of his advice show, “Dr. Phil,” in 2002.

McGraw took things a step further when he claimed, “I don’t like a lot of what he says or does.” But when asked if he has decided who will get his vote, he responded, “I think I have, but I’ll never tell.”

Online, those reacting to the interview tweeted, “The same speech? This is so cringe. So basically you don’t have any loyalty or feelings towards one or the other. You just wanted to speak. Narcissist.”

A few took jabs at some of guests on Dr. Phil’s hit talk show, where he sought to help troubled teens. One said, “Act of rebellion?! hes just like them kids he interviewed.

Another wrote, “So Dr. Phil had a temper tantrum…. But wants to therapy people?? Nah Phil… stay over there.”

A third added, “A man who preyed on vulnerable people for the purpose of a talk show endorsing Trump… seems correct.”

As for the backlash, McGraw said that he predicted it and that people are just so “hair-triggered right now by all the vitriol.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top