Who Is Lee Zeldin? Possible Trump Pick to Replace Pam Bondi Has Been Accused of Lying to Congress

As Attorney General Pam Bondi ends her tenure, a familiar figure within President Donald Trump’s orbit is emerging as a possible successor, drawing renewed attention to a record that has already sparked sharp debate.

Lee Zeldin, the current administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, is being discussed as a potential replacement as Trump removes Bondi amid controversy tied to the handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related files.

Possible Trump Pick to Replace Pam Bondi Has Been Accused of Lying to Congress
President Donald Trump listens as EPA chief Lee Zeldin (right) speaks as they make an announcement in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on Feb. 12. (Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump terminated Bondi as attorney general Thursday afternoon, a source told CNN.

Zeldin, a Republican from New York, has long positioned himself as a staunch ally of the former president. He served in Congress from 2015 to 2023 and was among those who defended Trump during his impeachment proceedings and later voted against certifying the 2020 election results.

Before his time in Washington, Zeldin served in the New York state Senate and built a dual career in law and the military. He spent more than two decades in the Army Reserve, including a deployment to Iraq, and became one of the youngest attorneys in New York at age 23.

Since taking over the EPA in January 2025, Zeldin has overseen sweeping changes to environmental policy. His tenure has been defined by efforts to roll back regulations tied to pollution, emissions, wetlands, and endangered species, moves he has framed as necessary to reduce federal overreach.

Yet those same actions have drawn sustained criticism.

An open letter signed by more than 160 environmental and health organizations accused Zeldin of undermining the agency’s core mission, citing proposed budget cuts, the dismantling of research programs, and the rollback of climate protections.

At the same time, congressional scrutiny has followed.

Senate Democrats have called for his resignation, accusing him of providing incomplete or misleading information during hearings tied to climate funding decisions. Zeldin and the EPA have rejected those claims, maintaining that the changes were part of a broader effort to eliminate waste and realign the agency’s priorities.

His political career has also been marked by controversy beyond his current role.

During his 2022 run for governor of New York, Zeldin’s campaign faced scrutiny after submitting thousands of duplicate petition signatures in an effort to secure a ballot line. State election officials ultimately invalidated the application, though Zeldin denied any intentional wrongdoing.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top