‘You Can’t Talk Bad About Me’: Daymond John Secures ‘Permanent’ Restraining Order Against ‘Shark Tank’ Contestants Who Publicly Bashed the Investor on Social Media About Their ‘Nightmare’ Experience

Daymond John has secured a court victory that puts a stop to the spreading of disparaging remarks about him and his business relationship with former “Shark Tank” contestants.

Last month, it was widely reported that he was seeking a restraining order against Bubba Q’s Boneless Baby Back Ribs owners Al “Bubba” Baker, his wife Sabrina, and their daughter Brittani. The business-minded trio appeared on season 5 of the hit show that pairs contestants with industry titans to help fund the scale of their enterprises.

A May 18 Los Angeles Times investigative piece profiled the Bakers and their experience partnering with John, and since then the celebrity investor has gone to the courts to get the family to stop discussing him.

(Left) Daymond John, (right) Al “Bubba Baker (right). (Photos: @thesharkdaymond/Instagram, @albubbabaker/Instagram)

John claimed that the allegations cost him a television show that was in the works, a speaking engagement, and a pending deal with a “major brand,” according to The Los Angeles Times.

As a result, the Baker family was ordered to remove any social media posts and barred from making further public remarks about their former business partners.

On July 21, the FUBU co-founder was granted a permanent restraining order in a New Jersey federal court hearing. A judge ruled that the Bakers’ claims of their “nightmare” experience working with John breached a non-disparagement clause they agreed to in a 2019 settlement involving John and Rastelli Foods, their meat manufacturer.

Four years ago, Baker and his family agreed to a $300,000 deal that gave John a 30 percent stake in their business. However, they allege that the terms of the agreement were quickly abrogated when John attempted to take a 35 percent cut.

In public Instagram and TikTok posts, they accused him and Rastelli Foods of withholding profits. They also allege that John misled them about his intentions to help expand Bubba Q’s Boneless Baby Back Ribs.

John said the court victory was a moment of vindication. “The federal Judge’s opinion have confirmed that I did not — and could not have — committed any wrongdoing. I have always upheld transparency and honesty throughout my journey as an entrepreneur.

“I am grateful for the support that I’ve received during this time and will continue defending my reputation with the same passion I bring to empowering fellow entrepreneurs,” he said in a statement to Deadline.

“Daymond John must be one of the worst human beings next to Musk. To get a restraining order saying “you cant talk bad about me” after allegedly ruining their lives?” wrote one person online.

Another commented, “It says “SHARK tank” for a reason, those people are shameless capitalist scoundrels.”

As of Monday, July 24, all of the Bakers’ disparaging social media posts have been removed. The Los Angeles Times report is not affected by the ruling.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top