‘She’s Costing the State a Ton of Money In Prison’: Alabama Board Denies Parole for Dying 71-Year-Old Woman Described as a ‘Model Prisoner’

A parole board in Alabama denied a dying woman parole last week. Leola Harris, a 71-year-old in a wheelchair suffering from end-stage renal failure, was denied parole on Jan. 10.

The Alabama Parole Board denied Harris’ parole in Macon County and only considered her application for a mere six minutes. She has been a model prisoner for the past 12 of her 19 years of incarceration at the Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women in Wetumpka.

Dying Alabama prisoner denied parole
Leola Harris denied parole despite being a model prisoner (Alabama prison)

The head of Redemption Earned and former Alabama Chief Justice Sue Bell Cobb called the parole denial an injustice and a waste of money.

“This denial is an injustice and a waste of tax dollars,” Cobb said in a statement. “They are supposed to ask if someone has been adequately punished. She’s 71 and has served 19 years, without violations in 12 years. Then the next question is: Do they pose a risk to public safety? The woman is in a wheelchair and cannot even go to the bathroom by herself. She’s dying and they just denied her parole. It is an injustice. It is shameful.”

Cobb also said the parole board failed Harris as well as the people of Alabama.

“Any reasonable person would conclude that 19 years is a sufficient sentence for a 71-year-old woman who is dying in prison,” said Cobb.

“No one would say that a dying woman, who is confined to a wheelchair, who cannot perform basic personal body functions unassisted, is a danger to the public. This Parole Board not only failed Ms. Leola Harris, but they also failed the taxpayers of the State of Alabama. This denial of medical parole to a wheelchair-bound, weak, and dying woman is an injustice that the people of Alabama ought not accept or be forced to pay for.”

Harris was convicted of murder in the shooting of Lennell Norris in 2001 and sentenced to 35 years. Norris was reportedly a friend of Harris’ who she said would often visit her in the evening. He was found shot to death at her kitchen table, and Harris testified that she did not shoot him.

Her attorneys argued that Harris should be paroled because she is confined to a wheelchair and is end-stage renal failure. She needs dialysis three times per week and is in end-stage renal failure. Her lawyers also argued that she has already served 19 years in prison and is too frail to be a threat to anyone. They believe she should live out her final days in a nursing home, not prison.

The Alabama Parole Board is also being criticized for denying 90 percent of the states eligible parole applications. Guidelines for granting parole that included a scoring system were provided in 2020, but the board only implemented the guidelines 30 percent of the time.

Executive director of the Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles Cam Ward confirmed the parole board has “total discretion” regardless of the guidelines. “The law says it’s up to the board,” said Ward. “They have total discretion.”

A former corrections officer noted that Alabama inmates are not permitted to tell their stories directly. Stacy George has also been vocal about the living conditions in Alabama prisons as well as the lack of prison staff.

“There are people that never need to actually get out of prison,” conceded George. “But there are people that do need to get out and get a second chance.”

On the day that Harris was denied parole, of the 46 inmates’ paroles being considered, two were continued and only one was granted.

The Attorney General of Alabama Steve Marshall released a statement that said that the board’s duty is not to appease advocates of mercy for the incarcerated.

“By law, the paramount duty of the board is to ensure public safety — not to appease the anti-incarceration community.”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top