‘Tesla Treats Its Employees Like This’: Former Tesla Employee Awarded $1.02M In Suit Against Company for Turning a Blind Eye to Racist and Hostile Work Environment

Tesla Inc. has been ordered to put its money where its reported values of cultivating a workplace sans discrimination lie, in the hands of a former employee.

That ex-employee is Melvin Berry, a Black man who sued the company in 2020 for failing to stop a white supervisor from allegedly hurling racial slurs at him. A private May 12 ruling by an arbitrator sided with Berry against the electric-car manufacturer, to the tune of $1.02 million.

A Tesla factory (Tesla.com)

The victory is rare for a discrimination suit where collecting data of the alleged harassment can be challenging, and proving actual wrongdoing can be even more arduous. But the arbitrator, former Sonoma County Superior Court judge Elaine Rushing, believed Berry and witness accounts proved Tesla turned a blind eye to the claims.

Employment attorney Cliff Palefsky — who is not associated with the case — weighed in on what he felt contributed to the outcome. “Racial discrimination awards are rare and it seems this was especially hard fought,” he told Bloomberg. “[Rushing] was clearly troubled by the facts, culture at the company and the tone of the defense,” he added.

“Case law is clear that one instance of a supervisor directing the N-word at a subordinate is sufficient to constitute severe harassment,” said Rushing. Tesla’s alleged lack of response to the matter also made it clear to Rushing the company was liable to Berry’s claims of harassment.

“This is a case of 23 year-old white man with only a high school education supervising a 43-year-old African American man with a college degree, a classic invitation for serious resentment,” added Rushing.

Berry, 43, began working for the company in 2015 as a materials handler, but his departure came in under two years. Berry alleged that his supervisor, who was half his age and had only obtained a high school diploma, frequently called him the N-word. When Berry reported the racial harassment he claimed the supervisor retaliated by making his already laborious duties even more strenuous.

Berry’s $1.02 million award is broken down as such: three-quarters goes toward attorney’s fees and legal cost, and Tesla must pay $266,278.50 in damages, including $100,000 for Berry’s emotional distress. As for Berry, he plans to take to some time to himself after the long-fought battle. However, he plans to launch his own media company for motion design and animation. He hopes his victory against sheds light on how “Tesla treats its employees.”

On social some people felt the award was too low; some called for boycotts while others were sadly not shocked by the claims made against Tesla.

Tesla, which is owned by billionaire Elon Musk, has more than 80,000 employees worldwide. While its cars may be all the craze, the company has been anything but exempt from numerous complaints of racist employees and harassment at its facilities.

Employees allegedly call the factories “the Plantation” and claim the workers are often referred to as “cotton pickers.” Former Fremont factor worker Aaron Craves said in a sworn statement that he endured similar racial harassment as Berry.

“I was directly called N-word and n—-a approximately 100 times at the Fremont factory. I heard the terms N-word and n—-a used over 100 times by co-workers, and by my lead Auggie, in the Tesla factory,” claimed Craven.

His statement and several others like it are a part of a 2017 lawsuit against Tesla, alleging rampant racism exhibited against Black employees. Since 2018, just under 200 employees have requested the right to sue Tesla for discriminatory practices ranging from skin color, age, race and more.

Tesla denies the claims, stating it is, “absolutely against any form of discrimination, harassment, or unfair treatment of any kind.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top