‘Deplorable’: Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham Slammed for Mocking Testimony from Black Police Officer And Others About Violent Jan. 6 Riot

After a Black police officer and others delivered emotional testimony about the violent Jan. 6 Capitol attack during the opening day of hearings conducted by the House select committee that is investigating the insurrection, Fox News commentators Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham mocked those who delivered the testimony.

Ingraham and Tucker used their July 27 shows to downplay what the officers defending the Capitol experienced on the day of the attack, and the social media backlash to their comments came swiftly.

Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham mocked those who delivered testimony about the Jan. 6 riot. Photo: Fox News/ YouTube screenshot.

On “The Ingraham Angle,” Ingraham mocked Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn by awarding him with a “Best Political Performance Awardm” saying, “The award for blatant use of party politics when facts fail, the Angle award goes to Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn.”

Dunn, who defended the Capitol the day of the attack, said on Tuesday that members of the mob told him that they were there to “stop the steal” and that President Joe Biden was not the president as they poured into the building wearing MAGA hats.

When Dunn told the insurrectionists that he voted for Biden and asked if his vote mattered, a woman in a pink MAGA shirt said, “You hear that, guys? This n—er voted for Joe Biden,” Dunn recalled Tuesday.

“Then the crowd joined in, screaming ‘Boo! F—ing n—er!’ No one had ever, ever called me a n—er while wearing the uniform of a Capitol Police officer,” Dunn said, adding that other Black officers had shared with him the racial abuse they suffered during the riot.

In response to Ingraham’s claim that Dunn’s testimony was simply a performance, social media users offered swift criticism.

“Despicable doesn’t begin to describe this,” one user wrote about Ingraham’s award ceremony.

“Deplorable,” said MSNBC analyst David Corn.

Ingraham mocked other officers who testified on Tuesday during her award segment. She awarded Sgt. Aquilino Gonell, an Iraq war veteran who testified he thought he would die during the attack, with a trophy emblazoned with the words “Best Exaggerated Performance.”

During Tuesday night’s episode of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Washington Metro Police Officer Michael Fanone was mocked by Carlson, who laughed in response to the officer’s testimony that he had “been left with psychological trauma and emotional anxiety,” as a result of the attack.

On Twitter, Carlson’s actions were described as “sociopathic behavior.”

Tucker also downplayed Gonell’s experience after he testified that he “was more afraid to work at the Capitol than my entire deployment to Iraq.” Carlson played a relatively quiet clip from the the day of the riot showing members of the mob moving around the building, saying, “Actually what happened on January 6, according to the video we do have, does not look a lot like Iraq. It’s not Fallujah.” 

Extensive footage of the attack has showed the far more violent moments that took place during the riot.

Fanone shared with CNN on Tuesday, that he received an offensive voicemail while giving testimony. In the voicemail, a man tells Fanone, “You’re a punk f-ggot, you’re a lying f-ck! … too bad they didn’t beat the sh-t out of you more. You’re a piece of sh-t!”

Twitter user MapleLeif pointed out that the man appeared to be imitating comments Ingraham had made earlier in the day, writing, “Fox News is inciting this.”

So far, more than 540 people have been charged for their roles in the attack amid what prosecutors have described as “likely the most complex investigation ever prosecuted by the Department of Justice.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top